In the following post two readers have questioned why this author is upset that the ordinance Councilor Wallace has been working on for over a year is going back to committee.
These two readers would like to have you believe that this author doesn't want public input. But quite contrary to their spin on this authors words, it is not the public input or lack there of that is the problem. In fact, there have been many many meetings and all have been open to the public. The public has had ample time to make comment. Rather it is the lack of positive moving forward action that is the problem.
http://bfgovernment.blogspot.com/2007/03/laws-are-changing.htmlThe Council just sat through a series of three to four meetings with the Council, the Mayor, the Planning and Zoning Officers, the lawyer and the committee that helped write this ordinance.
These meetings were long, drawn out, and open to the public. People attended these meetings and volunteered opinions and.... NOTHING. The Council did nothing to change any one of the issues brought up by the people in the audience. Neither did committee Councilor Wallace led that wrote this ordinance. In fact, this committee fought about why their ordinance was perfect and shouldn't be changed.
It is not the idea that extra public input is so horrible, in fact it is a good thing.
It is the fact that this is going through such a convoluted mess and nothing much seems to be moving forward. Again, typically when there is a committee, when it is finished it presents the work to the Council and then the Council takes over. That has not happened here.
The committee presented their work to the Council and then the Council sat there. It did NOTHING. It did not one thing while the attorney suggested changes, the Mayor suggested changes, the Planning and Zoning officer suggested changes and the public suggested changes. The Council did nothing and instead let Councilor Wallace take this back to the committee so they could consider the changes suggested. Despite the fact that, as mentioned previously, they lectured the audience about why their ordinance should not be changed at all.
And remember, as another reader pointed out, this committee left things vague so a court of law could decide what they meant. This is the committee that is unwilling to understand that each paragraph must work alone in an ordinance as well as in connection to each other. (This is how loopholes happen). This is the committee that wants clean pools to stop mosquitos but doesn't address buckets or tires stacked up on properties both of which are ugly and collect water that breeds mosquitos.
"El Tigre" asks what makes you think the pool issue isn't being taken care of? Is it? It hasn't been to date. The Council didn't fix it when they had the chance, when everyone was questioning this item.
It took over a year to get to this point. (A year longer than she promised it take to complete by the way.) And now it will take some more time for them to discuss suggested changes and in the meantime, this whole past year and until something is passed, NOTHING can be done about houses falling down etc etc ec.
The problem is not having public comment. There has been plenty of opportunity for public comment. The problem is the Council should have taken charge when it was sitting in meetings with this committee and it should have done it's job by listening to all of the myriad of suggestions and acted on them. Then it should have passed this law.
Instead it languishes in committee again. That is the problem.
Labels: Councilor, ordinances