The Budget Approved
The raises. Or rather the lack of raises. Or maybe more clearly the lack of equitable raises.
This author doesn't know much more than that but will say that it seems this is another year of another 'whopping' raise for the few at the top of the chain. The chief got a large raise and a few others supposedly recieved smaller raises and some even recieved smaller raises.
This author thought there was a wage survey completed. Surely after several years of "earning" large raises the head cop isn't so far off of the minimum that he needs a large raise again. Surely the others need raises too that will help bring their pay up.
The questions these employees need to ask themselves and the Mayor include the following:
How were the raises decided? Where they decided based on the wage survey that has been done? If so, where is the wage survey and where does it say that one person needs a better raise than everyone else?
And if the employees haven't been allowed to see the wage survey, then the employees need to write to the Attorney General about this. It falls under the open meeting laws.
Where the raises decided based on work performance? Then each employee should know that and know how to improve their work. Do they?
Raises need to be based on something tangible and easily understood- not favoritism or 'just because'. If they are not based on something like work performance, a wage survey, or a scaled pay schedule each employee has the right to sue and maybe they should.
Labels: budget
